10-Q
United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-28740
BioScrip, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
05-0489664
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
100 Clearbrook Road, Elmsford, NY
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
10523
(Zip Code) |
(914) 460-1600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o
On August 1, 2005, there were outstanding 37,045,726 shares of the registrants common stock,
$.0001 par value per share.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
BIOSCRIP, INC
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, expect per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5,443 |
|
|
$ |
2,957 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances
of $3,989 and $3,240, respectively) |
|
|
109,137 |
|
|
|
65,439 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
23,484 |
|
|
|
11,897 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,618 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
Short-term deferred taxes |
|
|
5,713 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
146,395 |
|
|
|
85,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
8,018 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
Long term deferred taxes, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,383 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
116,245 |
|
|
|
74,874 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
18,540 |
|
|
|
17,583 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,702 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
289,908 |
|
|
$ |
186,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,303 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
30,263 |
|
|
|
20,012 |
|
Claims payable |
|
|
26,917 |
|
|
|
28,659 |
|
Payables to plan sponsors |
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
11,528 |
|
|
|
12,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
70,875 |
|
|
|
70,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value: 40,000 shares authorized,
36,901 and 22,307 shares outstanding at June 30, 2005
and December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Treasury stock, 2,198 shares at cost
at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 |
|
|
(8,002 |
) |
|
|
(8,002 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
233,723 |
|
|
|
131,031 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(9,221 |
) |
|
|
(7,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
216,504 |
|
|
|
115,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
289,908 |
|
|
$ |
186,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
BIOSCRIP, INC
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
286,617 |
|
|
$ |
154,125 |
|
|
$ |
475,015 |
|
|
$ |
302,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
256,104 |
|
|
|
137,275 |
|
|
|
424,055 |
|
|
|
268,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
30,513 |
|
|
|
16,850 |
|
|
|
50,960 |
|
|
|
33,814 |
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
27,587 |
|
|
|
12,607 |
|
|
|
43,872 |
|
|
|
25,102 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
5,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
Merger and integration expenses |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
36,176 |
|
|
|
13,375 |
|
|
|
53,739 |
|
|
|
26,510 |
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
(5,663 |
) |
|
|
3,475 |
|
|
|
(2,779 |
) |
|
|
7,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before taxes |
|
|
(5,651 |
) |
|
|
3,244 |
|
|
|
(2,920 |
) |
|
|
6,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(2,111 |
) |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
(1,047 |
) |
|
|
2,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,540 |
) |
|
$ |
1,946 |
|
|
$ |
(1,873 |
) |
|
$ |
4,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares |
|
|
36,829 |
|
|
|
22,214 |
|
|
|
31,238 |
|
|
|
22,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares |
|
|
36,829 |
|
|
|
22,780 |
|
|
|
31,238 |
|
|
|
22,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
BIOSCRIP, INC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,873 |
) |
|
$ |
4,126 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,538 |
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
Tradename writeoff |
|
|
5,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash stock compensation |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Change in deferred tax |
|
|
(1,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for losses on receivables |
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
(3,057 |
) |
|
|
(3,683 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(1,926 |
) |
|
|
1,681 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,176 |
|
|
|
(3,278 |
) |
Claims payable |
|
|
(1,742 |
) |
|
|
2,799 |
|
Payables to plan sponsors and others |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(8,592 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(16,091 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(8,321 |
) |
|
|
(2,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment, net of disposals |
|
|
(1,486 |
) |
|
|
(355 |
) |
Cash acquired (used in) acquisition, net |
|
|
16,992 |
|
|
|
(14,256 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
17,069 |
|
|
|
(14,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Repayments) borrowings on line of credit, net |
|
|
(7,303 |
) |
|
|
10,585 |
|
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
Principal payments on short term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(6,262 |
) |
|
|
10,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,486 |
|
|
|
(6,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
2,957 |
|
|
|
9,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
5,443 |
|
|
$ |
2,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
|
$ |
2,109 |
|
|
$ |
1,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BIOSCRIP,
INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Numbers in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, notes and information included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-K) of BioScrip,
Inc. (BioScrip or the Company) filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Commission) under the Companys former name MIM Corporation on March 4, 2005. The unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions
to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete audited financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations
and cash flows for the periods presented have been included. Operating results for the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2005. The accounting policies followed for interim
financial reporting are similar to those disclosed in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Form 10-K. These accounting policies are described further below.
Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. On March 12, 2005, the Company acquired all of the issued and
outstanding stock of Chronimed, Inc. (Chronimed) (see Note 4 of Notes to the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Interim Financial Statements). Since that time, Chronimeds financial results have
been consolidated within the Companys financial statements. All significant intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits, lockbox deposits, money market accounts and
overnight investment accounts with maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase. Cash
equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair market value.
Receivables
Receivables include amounts due from plan sponsors under the Companys pharmacy benefit
management (PBM) agreements, estimated amounts due from pharmaceutical manufacturers for rebates,
service fees resulting from the distribution of certain drugs to their enrollees through retail and
other pharmacies, amounts due from certain third party payors, patient co-payments and patient
co-insurance.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Allowances for doubtful accounts are based on estimates of losses related to customer
receivable balances. The Company estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon a
variety of factors including the age of the outstanding receivables and our historical experience
of collections. The Company continually reviews the estimation process and makes changes to
estimates as necessary. Bad debt expense is recorded as an operating expense in the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The receivables acquired in conjunction with the acquisition of
Chronimed are recorded net as of March 12, 2005 and their related pre-acquisition allowances are
not reflected in the allowance balances noted on the face of the balance sheet.
4
Allowance for Contractual Discounts
The Company is reimbursed for the drugs and services it sells by many different third party
payors including insurance companies, Medicare and state Medicaid programs. The Company estimates
an allowance for contractual discounts based on historical experience and in certain cases on a
customer-specific basis given its interpretation of the contract terms or applicable regulations.
However, the reimbursement rates are often subject to interpretation that could result in payments
that differ from the Companys estimates. Updated regulations and contract negotiations occur
frequently, necessitating the Companys continual review and assessment of the estimation process.
Estimated contractual discounts are recorded as an offset to revenue in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Income.
Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in,
first-out method or the average cost method, depending on the related pharmacy system. Inventory
consists principally of goods held for resale. Included in the net inventory is a reserve for
obsolete inventory.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
assets. The estimated useful lives of the Companys assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
Useful Life |
Computer and office equipment |
|
3-5 years |
Furniture and fixtures |
|
5-7 years |
Leasehold improvements and leased assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the
related lease term or estimated useful life of the assets, whichever is less. The cost and related
accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts with the gain or
loss, if applicable, recorded in the statement of operations. Maintenance and repair costs are
expensed as incurred.
Impairment
of Long Lived Assets
We
evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate
the remaining estimated useful life of long lived assets, including
intangible assets, may warrant revision or that the remaining balance
of an asset may not be recoverable. The measurement of possible
impairment is based on the ability to recover the balance of assets
from expected future operating cash flows on an undiscounted basis.
Impairment losses, if any, would be determined based on the present
value of the cash flows using discount rates that reflect the
inherent risk of the underlying business. In the second half of 2005,
we will be pursuing a rebranding strategy to the single brand of
BioScrip. As a result of this strategy the value of the trade names
associated with Natural Living and Vitality Home Infusion has been
eliminated, and these assets have been removed from our balance
sheet. This resulted in a special charge of $5.8 million in the
second quarter of 2005.
Purchase Price Allocation
We account for acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, any assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are initially recorded at their estimated fair values. The final
recorded values of assets and liabilities are determined based on third party estimates and
independent valuations. Accordingly, our financial position or results of operations may be
affected by changes in estimates and judgments used to value these assets and liabilities.
Payables to Plan Sponsors
Payables to plan sponsors represent the sharing of pharmaceutical rebates with the plan
sponsors and, on a limited basis, profit sharing plans with certain contracts in the PBM services
segment.
The Company estimates the portion of those pharmacy rebates that are shared with plan sponsors
and adjusts pharmacy rebates payable to plan sponsors when the amounts are paid, typically on a
quarterly basis in arrears, or as significant events occur. These estimates are accrued
periodically based on actual and estimated claims data and agreed upon contractual rebate sharing
rates. The Company adjusts these estimates on a periodic basis based on changing circumstances
such as contract modifications, product mix subject to rebates, and changes in the applicable
formulary.
Revenue Recognition
The Company generates revenue principally through the sale of prescription drugs, which are
dispensed either through a pharmacy participating in the Companys retail pharmacy network in the
PBM Services segment or by a pharmacy owned by the Company. Revenue is primarily derived under
fee-for-service agreements. Prescription drug revenue is offset by the rebates shared with plan
sponsors.
5
Fee-For-Service Agreements. Fee-for-service agreements include: (i) specialty and mail
service agreements, where the Company dispenses prescription medications through its own pharmacy
facilities, and (ii) PBM agreements, where prescription medications are dispensed through
pharmacies participating in the Companys retail pharmacy network as well as through the Companys
mail service facility. Under fee-for-service agreements, revenue is recognized either: (a) when
the pharmacy services are reported to the Company through the point of sale (POS) claims
processing system and the drug is dispensed to the member, in the case of a prescription filled
through a pharmacy participating in the Companys retail pharmacy network, or (b) at the time the
drug is shipped or picked up at a pharmacy, in the case of a prescription filled through a pharmacy
owned by the Company.
Revenue generated under PBM agreements is classified as gross or net by the Company based on
whether the Company is acting as a principal or an agent in the fulfillment of prescriptions
through its retail pharmacy network. When the Company has a contractual obligation to pay a
network pharmacy provider for benefits provided to its plan sponsors members, and has other
indications of risk and reward, the Company includes payments (which includes the drug ingredient
cost) from these plan sponsors as revenue and payments to the network pharmacy providers as cost of
revenue, as these transactions require the Company to assume credit risk and act as a principal.
If the Company merely acts as an agent, and consequently administers plan sponsors network
pharmacy contracts, the Company does not assume credit risk and records only the administrative
fees (and not the drug ingredient cost) as revenue.
Co-Payments;
Co-Insurance. When prescriptions are filled and the Company is acting as a
participating pharmacy in another PBMs or payors pharmacy network, the Company collects and
retains co-payments or co-insurance from plan sponsors members and records these receipts as
revenue when the amounts are collected or deemed collectible and reasonably estimable. When
prescriptions are filled through pharmacies participating in the Companys retail pharmacy
networks, the Company is not entitled to retain co-payments and
co-insurance and accordingly does not account for
retail pharmacy co-payments or co-insurance in its financial statements. In its capacity as a PBM,
pharmacy network co-payments and co-insurance are never billed or collected by the Company and the Company has no
legal right or obligation to receive them as they are collected by its network pharmacies.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue includes the costs of pharmaceutical purchases, fees paid to pharmacies,
shipping and other direct and indirect costs associated with pharmacy management, claims processing
operations and mail order services, offset by volume rebates received from pharmaceutical
manufacturers.
Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing the Companys consolidated financial statements,
management is required to estimate income taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes under SFAS
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires the use of the asset and liability
method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred taxes are determined by
calculating the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
accounting and tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The resulting deferred tax assets and
liabilities are included in the Companys consolidated balance sheets. A valuation allowance is
recorded against deferred tax assets when, in the opinion of the Companys management, it is more
likely than not that the Company will not be able to realize the benefit from its deferred tax
assets.
Disclosure of Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments consist mainly of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and the line of credit. The carrying amounts of all of these
financial instruments approximate fair value due to their fully liquid or short-term nature.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for employee stock and stock-based compensation plans through the
intrinsic value method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25) as permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS
No. 123) and as such, generally we do not currently recognize compensation expense for employee
stock options.
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123. SFAS
No. 123(R) supersedes APB 25 and
6
amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows, to require that excess tax benefits be reported
as a financing cash inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid. Generally, the approach to
estimating the fair value of options in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in
SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including
grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair
values. Pro forma disclosure will no longer be permissible as an alternative under GAAP principles.
SFAS No. 123(R) must be adopted no later than the first quarter of 2006.
The Company will adopt the fair value-based method of accounting for share-based payments
effective January 1, 2006. Had we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that
standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as described in the disclosure of pro
forma net income and earnings per share below.
The Companys compensation cost for stock option plans for employees and directors, had it
been determined in accordance with the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, would have
been as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net (loss) income, as reported |
|
|
(3,540 |
) |
|
$ |
1,946 |
|
|
|
(1,873 |
) |
|
$ |
4,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Stock award-based employee compensation included in reported net
income, net of related tax effect |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effect |
|
$ |
(400 |
) |
|
$ |
(906 |
) |
|
$ |
(775 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net (loss) income |
|
|
(3,935 |
) |
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
|
|
(2,638 |
) |
|
$ |
2,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
As pro forma compensation expense for options granted is recorded over the vesting period of
options, future pro forma compensation expense may be greater as additional options or awards are
granted.
NOTE 2
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic income per common share and diluted
income per common share. For the quarter and year ended June 30, 2005 common stock equivalents are
not included as they would be antidilutive.
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,540 |
) |
|
$ |
1,946 |
|
|
$ |
(1,873 |
) |
|
$ |
4,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding |
|
|
36,829 |
|
|
|
22,214 |
|
|
|
31,238 |
|
|
|
22,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) income per common share |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding |
|
|
36,829 |
|
|
|
22,214 |
|
|
|
31,238 |
|
|
|
22,187 |
|
Common share equivalents of outstanding
stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
36,829 |
|
|
|
22,780 |
|
|
|
31,238 |
|
|
|
22,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) income per common share |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 3
OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Company
operates in two reportable segments: (1) Specialty Services, which is comprised
of specialty pharmacy distribution and clinical management services; and (2) PBM Services, which is
comprised of fully integrated pharmacy benefit management and traditional mail services.
Corporate overhead is allocated between the two segments based on total selling, general and
administrative expenses for each segment. All of the activities related to the acquisition of
Chronimed, with the exception of corporate overhead, have been included in the Specialty Services
segment.
The quarter
and year to date loss from operations in the Specialty Services segment includes
$6.6 million and $7.0 million, respectively in special charges for the write off of intangible assets and merger and integration
costs. The allocated corporate overhead includes expenses that the
Company expects to eliminate by the first quarter of 2006 as part of
its merger cost savings efforts.
8
Segment Reporting Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Services |
|
$ |
193,114 |
|
|
$ |
60,457 |
|
|
$ |
288,876 |
|
|
$ |
118,173 |
|
PBM Services |
|
|
93,503 |
|
|
|
93,668 |
|
|
|
186,139 |
|
|
|
184,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
286,617 |
|
|
$ |
154,125 |
|
|
$ |
475,015 |
|
|
$ |
302,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Services |
|
$ |
685 |
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
PBM Services |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
898 |
|
|
$ |
490 |
|
|
$ |
1,538 |
|
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Services |
|
$ |
(6,547 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
2,525 |
|
|
$ |
(5,479 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
6,183 |
|
PBM Services |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(5,663 |
) |
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
|
$ |
(2,779 |
) |
|
$ |
7,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
230,449 |
|
|
|
118,452 |
|
PBM Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,459 |
|
|
$ |
61,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
289,908 |
|
|
$ |
179,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Services |
|
$ |
902 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
1,035 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
PBM Services |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,110 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
1,486 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The three months ended June 30, 2005 includes $5,886 of special charges and
$747 of merger expenses, the six months ended June 30, 2005 includes $5,886
of special charges and $1,134 of merger expenses. |
The following table sets forth significant customer(s) by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Significant customer A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PBM Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
31,147 |
|
|
$ |
24,624 |
|
|
$ |
59,615 |
|
|
$ |
49,481 |
|
% of Total Revenue |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant customer B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PBM Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
28,795 |
|
|
$ |
25,795 |
|
|
$ |
57,130 |
|
|
$ |
49,960 |
|
% of Total Revenue |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Specialty Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
4,907 |
|
|
$ |
4,139 |
|
|
$ |
9,571 |
|
|
$ |
7,865 |
|
% of Total Revenue |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
9
NOTE 4 ACQUISITIONS
Chronimed Inc. Acquisition
On
March 12, 2005 the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Chronimed in a
stock-for-stock transaction pursuant to which each share of Chronimed common stock was exchanged
for 1.12 shares of the Companys common stock. The results of operations of Chronimed were
included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations beginning March 12, 2005. The acquisition of
Chronimed added an additional 28 specialty pharmacies throughout the
U.S. to the Companys existing
pharmacies. Chronimeds operations have been included in the Specialty Services segment. The
acquisition has been accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, from the
date of acquisition.
The
aggregate purchase price paid for Chronimed was $105,258, including direct expenses of $3,692
associated with the acquisition. The 14,381 shares of common stock exchanged and 2,612 stock
options assumed in the acquisition were valued using the average market price of the Companys
common stock during the period beginning two days before and ending two days after the revised
merger agreement was announced. The purchase price has been allocated on a preliminary basis to
the acquired assets and liabilities based on managements estimates of their fair value and a
preliminary independent valuation. The purchase price will be finally determined based on an
independent valuation which may result in adjustments to managements estimates. As part of the
purchase accounting, Chronimeds receivables are recorded net as of March 12, 2005 and their
related pre-acquisition allowances are not reflected in the allowance balances noted on the face of
the balance sheet.
As part of the merger, the Company consolidated Chronimeds Minnetonka, Minnesota mail service
operations into the Companys higher capacity mail distribution operation in Columbus, Ohio and
closed the Minnetonka mail facility. Total severance costs for the closing of the Minnetonka
facility are expected to be approximately $1,200. Of that amount $161 was paid prior to the merger
as a current period expense and $939 was accrued for in the first quarter of 2005 and is included
in the purchase price. The following table outlines severance costs that were accrued for at
March 12, 2005 and subsequently paid out by June 30, 2005.
2005 Severance Costs Chronimed
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Liability assumed 3/12/05 |
|
$ |
939 |
|
Payment during Q105 |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Additional liability recorded Q205 |
|
|
74 |
|
Payments during Q205 |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
Ending liability at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
10
The following table sets forth the allocation of the purchase price as of June 30, 2005.
Purchase Price Allocation
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
Value of stock exchanged |
|
$ |
90,196 |
|
Value of stock options assumed |
|
|
11,370 |
|
Transaction costs |
|
|
3,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
105,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: net tangible assets as of March 12, 2005 |
|
|
54,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of purchase price over net tangible assets acquired |
|
$ |
50,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary allocation of excess purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
Customer lists and non compete agreements |
|
$ |
9,560 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
41,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired
with the purchase of Chronimed.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short term investments |
|
$ |
20,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
42,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
9,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets |
|
|
3,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long term assets |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
($ |
5,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(14,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accrued severance |
|
|
(1,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
(3,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
|
|
|
($ |
23,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,426 |
|
|
The following unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, has been prepared assuming Chronimed was
acquired as of January 1, 2004, utilizing the purchase method of accounting, with pro forma
adjustments for amortization of intangibles associated with the acquisition. The number of basic
and diluted shares has also been adjusted assuming the exchange ratio of 1.12 shares of common
stock of the Company exchanged for each outstanding share of Chronimed common stock. The three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2005 include pretax expense of $747 and $3,171, respectively, for
merger and integration expenses. The periods ending June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 include
pretax amortization expense of $1,289 and $1,264, respectively, associated with the Chronimed
acquisition. A more detailed reconciliation of the pro forma
Statement of Operations can be found in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Result of Operations in Item 2 of
this report. The pro
11
forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily
indicative of the results that would have been realized had the acquisition occurred on January 1,
2004. This pro forma information is not intended to be a projection of future operating results.
Pro
forma Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
Revenue |
|
$ |
286,617 |
|
|
$ |
311,784 |
|
|
$ |
589,094 |
|
|
$ |
602,178 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
(3,540 |
) |
|
$ |
3,206 |
|
|
$ |
(2,698 |
) |
|
$ |
6,143 |
|
Basic income per common share |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Diluted income per common share |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Natural Living Acquisition
On February 2, 2004 the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Natural
Living, Inc., d/b/a Fair Pharmacy, a specialty pharmaceutical provider located in Bronx, New York
for $15,000 in cash. The acquisition enhanced the Companys HIV, Oncology and Hepatitis C disease
therapies and was incorporated into the Companys Specialty Services segment.
Had this acquisition taken place on January 1, 2004, consolidated sales and income would not
have been significantly different from the year to date 2004 reported amounts.
NOTE 5 RESTRUCTURING
The acquisition of Chronimed has resulted in the consolidation of certain finance and
information technology functions. The Companys Rhode Island offices, which include the finance
and information technology functions, will be closed as a result of these consolidations. These
functions are being transitioned to the Companys Minnesota offices. Accordingly, there have been
and will continue to be severance and exit costs associated with these consolidations.
In association with the consolidation of the finance and information technology departments,
on March 4, 2005 the Company notified 67 employees that their employment with the Company would be
involuntarily terminated. Of these 67 employees, approximately 45 employees support the Specialty
Services segment with the balance supporting the PBM Services segment. Transition plans are being
finalized, but substantially all employees are expected to be terminated by December 31, 2005.
Estimated severance costs in connection with this restructuring are being recorded in accordance
with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS 146),
with the expense being allocated over the estimated retention period of employees. As of June 30,
2005, three employees affected by the consolidation have been terminated. The balance are still
actively employed and on the Companys payroll. The total estimated restructuring costs for the
consolidation of these two departments are expected to be approximately $2,000. Severance costs of
$602 were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses for employee separation costs in
the second quarter of 2005, in connection with the termination of these employees as reflected
below. Total severance costs recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $800.
12
2005 Severance Costs Rhode Island
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Liability at March 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
198 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Provisions |
|
|
602 |
|
|
Ending liability at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
755 |
|
|
NOTE 6 LITIGATION MATTERS
On August 16, 2004, a lawsuit encaptioned Unger v. Chronimed Inc., et al. was filed in
the District Court in Hennepin County, Minnesota against Chronimed and each of its then current
directors. On December 10, 2004, an amended complaint was filed to add an additional plaintiff and
the Company as a defendant. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that in structuring the terms
of the proposed merger, each of the members of Chronimeds Board of Directors breached their
respective fiduciary duties to Chronimeds shareholders and personally benefited Henry F.
Blissenbach, who was then serving as Chronimeds, and currently serves as the Companys, Chief
Executive Officer, as well as other members of Chronimeds management. Chronimed and the
individual defendants deny the allegations, believe the action is without merit and intend to
vigorously defend against these allegations. To that end, we filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs
claims. On May 10, 2004 the Minnesota District court dismissed plaintiffs claims without
prejudice. On July 1, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion to amend the dismissed complaint and a motion
to vacate the courts dismissal of the action with leave to amend the dismissed complaint. A
hearing on those motions has been scheduled for October 11, 2005.
On February 14, 2005, a complaint was filed in the Alabama Circuit Court for Barbour County,
captioned Eufaula Drugs, Inc. v. ScriptSolutions [sic]. The complaint pleads
breach of contract and related legal claims on behalf of a putative nationwide class of pharmacies
alleging insufficient reimbursement for prescriptions dispensed, principally on the theory that
ScripSolutions, one of the Companys subsidiaries, was obligated to update its prescription pricing
files on a daily, rather than weekly, basis. ScripSolutions removed the case to the United States
Federal District Court for the Middle District of Alabama in April 2005. The plaintiff moved to
remand the action to state court, which ScripSolutions opposed; the motion is awaiting decision.
ScripSolutions also moved in May to dismiss the complaint on jurisdictional grounds or to transfer
the matter to a federal court in New York or Rhode Island. Plaintiff recently filed its
opposition and ScripSolutions will file a reply, at which point the motion will await decision.
ScripSolutions has not filed an answer to the complaint and no other proceedings have occurred.
ScripSolutions intends to deny the plaintiffs allegations and defend the claims vigorously. The
action is one of approximately 14 substantially identical actions commenced in Alabama courts
against Pharmacy Benefit Management companies.
The Company has been informed by the office of the United States Attorney in Boston,
Massachusetts, that its Chronimed Holdings, Inc. dba StatScript
Pharmacy subsidiary (StatScript),
along with other parties, are defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for
the District of Massachusetts under the so-called qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act
(the Act). A qui tam action is a civil lawsuit brought by one or more individuals (a qui tam
relator) for an alleged submission to the federal government of a false claim for payment. The
complaint has been filed under seal and has not been served on or provided to the Company or
StatScript. The United States has a right to intervene in the action but has not yet determined
whether to do so. The U.S. Attorneys office has advised the Company that the allegations relate
to distribution of a pharmaceutical product and that StatScript submitted Medicaid reimbursement
claims during the years 1997 through 2000 aggregating approximately $17.5 million. The Company
does not know what relief is sought in the complaint. The Act provides for recovery of up to three
times the amount of false claims, penalties, and interest. At this time, BioScrip cannot determine
what defenses it may have to the allegations of the complaint or estimate the amount of damages in
the event of an adverse ruling.
NOTE 7 CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
The following table outlines contracts with Plan Sponsors having revenues and/or accounts
receivable that individually exceeded 10% of the Companys total revenues and/or accounts
receivable during the applicable time period:
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Sponsor |
|
|
A |
|
B |
|
|
|
Year-to-date period ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
% of total accounts receivable at period end |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Year-to-date period ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
% of total accounts receivable at period end |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Plan Sponsor (A) is in the PBM Services segment
Plan Sponsor (B) revenue and accounts receivable is primarily in the PBM Services
segment with a lesser amount in the Specialty Services segment.
****
14
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements, including the notes thereto, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-K) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Commission), as well as our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (this Report).
This Report contains statements not purely historical and which may be considered
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), including statements regarding our expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions
or strategies regarding the future. These forward looking statements may include statements
relating to our business development activities, sales and marketing efforts, the status of
material contractual arrangements, including the negotiation or re-negotiation of such
arrangements, future capital expenditures, the effects of regulation and competition on our
business, our future operating performance and the results, benefits and risks associated with the
integration of acquired companies. Investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, that
actual results may differ materially from those possible results discussed in the forward-looking
statements as a result of various factors. These factors include, among other things, increased
government regulation related to the health care and insurance industries in general and more
specifically, pharmacy benefit management and specialty pharmaceutical distribution organizations,
the existence of complex laws and regulations relating to our business, increased competition from
our competitors, including competitors with greater financial, technical, marketing and other
resources. This Report contains information regarding important factors that could cause such
differences. Except as required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to supplement these
forward-looking statements to reflect any future events and circumstances.
Business Overview
We provide comprehensive pharmaceutical care solutions. We partner with healthcare payors,
government agencies, physicians, and patients to deliver cost effective prescription medication
and/or clinical management programs that enhance the quality of patient life. These services are
organized under two reportable operating segments: specialty pharmacy distribution (Specialty
Services) and pharmacy benefit management and mail services (collectively, PBM Services).
Our specialty
services capabilities include the distribution of medications
manufactured to improve the care of individuals with complex health conditions such as HIV/AIDS,
Cancer, Immunodeficiency Disorders (IVIG), Hepatitis C, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Multiple Sclerosis,
and Organ Transplantation. We have 30 retail locations in 25 major urban markets across the U.S.,
providing specialty prescription drug access nationwide in most urban communities in a high-touch
community-based environment. Specialty services are primarily offered
to members who are chronically ill, genetically impaired, or afflicted with potentially life
threatening diseases. Specialty services are also offered to physicians (in group practice and
hospital settings) on behalf of their patients. These physicians typically have network
affiliations with Plan Sponsors, who in turn have a relationship with us.
As part of our PBM and Specialty Services, we offer our customers a wide selection of clinical
services including pharmacy case management, therapy assessment, compliance monitoring, health risk
assessment, patient education and interaction evaluation, pharmacy claims processing, mail service
and related prescription distribution, benefit design consultation, drug utilization review,
formulary management and consultation, drug data analysis, drug interaction management, program
management and pharmaceutical rebate administration.
On March 12, 2005 we acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Chronimed, Inc.
(together with its subsidiaries Chronimed) in a stock-for-stock transaction valued at $105.3
million. Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition, each share of Chronimed common stock was
exchanged for 1.12 shares of our common stock. In conjunction with the merger we changed our name
from MIM Corporation to BioScrip, Inc. The acquisition of Chronimed added an additional 28
specialty pharmacies throughout the U.S. The acquisition complements the Companys business model
and provides a platform for continued growth. The operations and financial results of Chronimed
are included in the Specialty Services segment. The acquisition has been recorded using the
purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations.
15
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). In preparing our financial statements, we are
required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We
evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates and judgments on
historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results may
differ from these estimates, and different assumptions or conditions may yield different estimates.
The following discussion highlights what we believe to be the critical accounting policies and
judgments made in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We generate revenue principally through the sale of prescription drugs, which are dispensed
either through a pharmacy participating in our retail pharmacy network in the PBM Services segment
or by a pharmacy owned by us. Revenue is recognized either: (a) when the pharmacy services are
reported to us through the point of sale (POS) claims processing system and the drug is dispensed
to the Member (in the case of a prescription filled through a pharmacy participating in our retail
pharmacy network), or (b) at the time the drug is shipped (in the case of a prescription filled
through a pharmacy owned by us). The share of any rebates paid to our plan sponsors is recorded
as a reduction of revenue.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Allowances for doubtful accounts are based on estimates of losses related to customer
receivable balances. The procedure for estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts requires
significant judgment and assumptions. The risk of collection varies based upon the product, the
payor and the patients ability to pay the amounts not reimbursed by the payor. We estimate the
allowance for doubtful accounts based upon a variety of factors including the age of the
outstanding receivables and our historical experience of collections, adjusting for current
economic conditions and, in some cases, evaluating specific customer accounts for risk of loss. We
continually review the estimation process and make changes to the estimates as necessary.
Allowance for Contractual Discounts
We are reimbursed for the drugs and services we sell by various types of payors including
insurance companies, Medicare and state Medicaid programs. Revenues and related accounts
receivable are recorded net of payor contractual discounts to reflect the estimated net billable
amounts for the products and services delivered. We estimate the allowance for contractual
discounts based on historical experience and in certain cases on a customer-specific basis given
our interpretation of the contract terms or applicable regulations. However, the reimbursement
rates are often subject to interpretation that could result in payments that differ from our
estimates. Additionally, updated regulations and contract negotiations occur frequently,
necessitating our continual review and assessment of the estimation process.
Rebates
Manufacturers rebates are recorded as estimates until such time as the rebate monies are
received. These estimates are based on historical results and trends and are revised on a regular
basis depending on our latest forecasts. Should actual results differ, adjustments will be
recorded in future earnings. In some instances rebate payments are shared with our managed care
organizations. Shared rebates are recorded as a reduction of revenue. Total rebates are recorded
as a reduction of cost of goods sold.
Purchase Price Allocation
We account for acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, any assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are initially recorded at their estimated fair values. The final
recorded values of assets and liabilities are determined based on third party estimates and
independent valuations. Accordingly, our financial position or results of operations may be
affected by changes in estimates and judgments used to value these assets and liabilities.
16
Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to
estimate income taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109). SFAS No. 109 requires the use of the asset and liability method of
accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred taxes are determined by calculating the
future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial accounting and tax bases
of existing assets and liabilities. The resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities are included
in our consolidated balance sheet. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets
when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that we will be able to realize the
benefit from the deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets that will be utilized within twelve
months are classified as current assets.
Impairment of Long Lived Assets
We evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining
estimated useful life of long lived assets, including intangible assets, may warrant revision or
that the remaining balance of an asset may not be recoverable. The measurement of possible
impairment is based on the ability to recover the balance of assets from expected future operating
cash flows on an undiscounted basis. Impairment losses, if any, would be determined based on the
present value of the cash flows using discount rates that reflect the inherent risk of the
underlying business. In the second half of 2005, we will be pursuing a rebranding strategy to the
single brand of BioScrip. As a result of this strategy the value of the trade names associated
with Natural Living, Inc. and Vitality Home Infusion Services, Inc. has been eliminated, and these assets have been
removed from our balance sheet. This resulted in a special charge of $5.8 million in the second
quarter of 2005.
Effective January 1, 2002 we adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS
No. 142). This statement addresses the accounting and reporting of goodwill and other intangible
assets subsequent to their acquisition. Since adoption of SFAS No. 142 in July 2001, amortization
of goodwill has discontinued and goodwill is reviewed at least annually for impairment.
We evaluate goodwill for impairment based on a two-step process. The first step compares the
fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of
a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and
the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of the reporting
unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is necessary to
measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of
reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the
reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss would
be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. We have two reporting units and both of the fair
values of the reporting units exceeded their carrying amounts resulting in no impairment charges in
fiscal year 2004.
17
Results of Operations
The tables below present the reconciliation between GAAP (reported) and non-GAAP (pro forma)
results of the Company, assuming the acquisition of Chronimed had occurred on January 1, 2004. Related
estimated amortization expense is added, and the adjusted shares reflect the conversion of
Chronimed shares at the 1.12 exchange ratio for comparative purposes. We believe this information
to be more helpful in gaining an understanding of future results and trends. In the following
Managements Discussion and Analysis we provide discussion of both reported results as set forth in
the Financial Statements and the pro forma results as presented in the tables below.
Pro Forma Consolidated Results
(in thousands, except per share and percentage data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
BioScrip as Reported |
|
MIM Corp. |
|
Chronimed |
|
Adjustment |
|
Combined |
Revenue |
|
$ |
286,617 |
|
|
$ |
154,125 |
|
|
$ |
157,659 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
311,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
256,104 |
|
|
|
137,275 |
|
|
|
140,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
30,513 |
|
|
|
16,850 |
|
|
|
16,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,641 |
|
% of
Revenue |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative
expenses |
|
|
27,587 |
|
|
|
12,607 |
|
|
|
13,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,184 |
|
Amortization of
intangibles |
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,264 |
(1) |
|
|
2,032 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
5,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger and
integration expenses |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
expenses |
|
|
36,176 |
|
|
|
13,375 |
|
|
|
13,577 |
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
28,216 |
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from
operations |
|
|
(5,663 |
) |
|
|
3,475 |
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
5,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
(expense), net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before
income taxes |
|
|
(5,651 |
) |
|
|
3,244 |
|
|
|
3,276 |
|
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
5,256 |
|
Income tax (benefit)
expense |
|
|
(2,111 |
) |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,540 |
) |
|
$ |
1,946 |
|
|
$ |
2,031 |
|
|
$ |
(771 |
) |
|
$ |
3,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average
shares |
|
|
36,829 |
|
|
|
22,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,390 |
|
Diluted weighted
average shares |
|
|
36,829 |
|
|
|
22,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net (loss) income
per share |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Diluted net (loss)
income per share |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects estimated amortization expense for the entire quarter |
18
Pro Forma Consolidated Results
(in thousands, except per share and percentage data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
MIM Corp. |
|
Chronimed |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
MIM Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
As Reported |
|
Pre-Merger |
|
Adjustments |
|
Combined |
|
As Reported |
|
Chronimed |
|
Adjustments |
|
Combined |
Revenue |
|
$ |
475,015 |
|
|
$ |
114,079 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
589,094 |
|
|
$ |
302,177 |
|
|
$ |
300,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
602,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
424,055 |
|
|
|
101,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,210 |
|
|
|
268,363 |
|
|
|
267,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
50,960 |
|
|
|
12,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,884 |
|
|
|
33,814 |
|
|
|
32,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,971 |
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
|
|
43,872 |
|
|
|
11,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,210 |
|
|
|
25,102 |
|
|
|
26,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,745 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064 |
(1) |
|
|
3,911 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,528 |
(1) |
|
|
3,936 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
5,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger and integration expenses |
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
53,739 |
|
|
|
13,375 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
68,178 |
|
|
|
26,510 |
|
|
|
26,643 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
55,681 |
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
(2,779 |
) |
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
(4,294 |
) |
|
|
7,304 |
|
|
|
5,514 |
|
|
|
(2,528 |
) |
|
|
10,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(295 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(2,920 |
) |
|
|
(367 |
) |
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
(4,351 |
) |
|
|
6,877 |
|
|
|
5,721 |
|
|
|
(2,528 |
) |
|
|
10,070 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(1,047 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
2,751 |
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
3,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,873 |
) |
|
$ |
(223 |
) |
|
$ |
(599 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,698 |
) |
|
$ |
4,126 |
|
|
$ |
3,547 |
|
|
$ |
(1,530 |
) |
|
$ |
6,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares |
|
|
31,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,238 |
|
|
|
22,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,390 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares |
|
|
31,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,238 |
|
|
|
22,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Diluted net (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects estimated amortization expense for the entire period |
Revenue. Reported revenue for the second quarter of 2005 was $286.6 million compared to $154.1
million for the second quarter of 2004. This increase was concentrated in the Specialty Services
segment, and is primarily attributable to the acquisition of Chronimed (discussed in Note 4 of the
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements). Revenue for the six
months period ended June 30, 2005 was $475.0 million compared to $302.2 million for the same period
in 2004. The majority of this increase is attributed to the Chronimed acquisition, which was not
included in the 2004 results. The PBM Services segment revenue increased $2.1 million to $186.1
million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $184.0 million for the same period in 2004.
New members in existing contracts and additional contracts offset the termination of certain PBM
clients, the most significant being Value Options, which terminated its contract effective November
30, 2004.
On a pro forma combined basis, revenue for the second quarter of 2005 was $286.6 million
compared to $311.8 million for the same period in 2004, a
$25.2 million, or 8%, decrease. Second
quarter 2005 Specialty Services revenue declined
19
$25.0 million,
or 11%, from $193.1 million to
$218.1 million for the same period last year, due primarily to the loss of the
Aetna specialty pharmacy distribution contract that ended February 28, 2005. Revenue from Aetna
was approximately $31.0 million in last years second quarter. PBM Services revenue, which
includes traditional mail service, decreased for the second quarter of 2005 to $93.5 million
compared to $93.7 million for the same period last year. PBM Services was impacted negatively by
the loss of previously mentioned contracts, offset by continued growth from core customers.
Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit. Reported cost of revenue for the second quarter of 2005 was
$256.1 million compared to $137.3 million for the same period in 2004. Gross margin as a
percentage of revenue decreased to 10.6% in the second quarter of 2005 compared to 10.9% for the
same period in 2004. The reported year to
date cost of revenue was $424.1 million for the period ended June 30, 2005 compared to $268.4 for
the period ended June 30, 2004. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 10.7% for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 11.2% for the same period last year. These decreases are primarily a result of
pricing pressures in the Specialty Services segment, particularly in specialty mail and infusion.
Pro
forma combined cost of revenue decreased $22.0 million, or 8%, from $278.1 for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 to $256.1 for the same period in 2005. Pro forma combined cost of revenue for
the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $525.2 million compared to $536.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2004. As expected, we experienced a decline in gross margin as a percentage of
revenue for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005 primarily as a result of continued downward pricing pressure
in the Specialty Services segment, particularly in specialty mail and infusion. This decline was
partially offset by gross margin rate increases in the PBM Services segment created by the loss of
lower margin contracts.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. For the three months ended June 30, 2005,
selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) increased to $27.6 million, or 9.6% of total
revenue, from $12.6 million, or 8.2% of total revenue, for the same period a year ago. This
increase in SG&A is the result of the addition of Chronimeds expenses for the entire period and
includes certain duplicative expenses associated with the consolidation of operations. For the six
months ended June 30, 2005, SG&A was $43.9 million, or 9.2% of total revenue, compared to $25.1, or
8.3% of total revenue, for the same period in 2004.
Pro forma SG&A for the second quarter of 2005 was $27.6 million, or 9.6% of total revenue,
compared to $26.2 million, or 8.4% of total revenue, for the second quarter of 2004. For the six
months ended June 30, 2005, pro forma SG&A was $55.2 million, or 9.4% of total revenue, compared
to $51.7 million, or 8.6% of total revenue, for the same period in 2004. This higher level of
spending does not reflect expected merger related cost savings.
We expect that SG&A expense combined with amortization expense will be between $26 and $27
million in the first quarter of 2006. This
level of spending reflects expected cost savings related to the
Chronimed merger.
Amortization of Intangibles. For the second quarter of 2005 we recorded amortization expense
from intangibles of $2.0 million compared to amortization expense of $0.8 million in 2004. The
preliminary valuation of the amortizable intangible assets associated with the acquisition of
Chronimed is $9.6 million. This acquisition resulted in a higher estimated amortization expense in
the second quarter of 2005 compared to 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 we recorded
$2.8 million of amortization expense compared to $1.4 million in 2004. The increase in 2005 was the
result of the estimated amortization expense associated with the Chronimed acquisition.
The pro forma amortization expense includes an estimated $1.3 million of amortization of the
intangible assets associated with the Chronimed acquisition for the quarters ended June 30, 2005
and June 30, 2004. Amortization expense for 2004 includes only five months of the amortization of
intangible assets associated with the acquisition of Natural Living, Inc. in February of 2004,
compared to six months of amortization of intangible assets in the current year.
Special Charges. During the second quarter of 2005, we wrote off the $5.8 million balance of
value of the trade name intangible assets associated with Vitality Home Infusion Services, Inc. and
Natural Living. The rebranding of all of our business lines to a single brand, BioScrip, prompted
the write off of these existing trade name intangible assets.
Merger and Integration Expenses. Merger and integration expenses for the second quarter of
2005 were $0.7 million, consisting primarily of severance and consulting expenses. Merger and
integration expenses for the six months of 2005 were $1.1 million, consisting primarily of
severance, legal fees and consulting expenses.
20
Net Interest Income (Expense). Net interest income was $0.01 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2005 compared to net interest expense of $0.2 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2004. Interest expense associated with our line of credit was lower in the second quarter
of 2005 as our average borrowing levels were lower. Interest expense was further offset by
interest income received on overnight investments of excess cash and the receipt of interest on a
past due receivable. Net interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $0.1 million
compared to $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 for the same reasons stated above.
Pro forma net interest income was $0.01 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005
compared to net interest expense of $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004.
Interest expense associated with the line of credit was lower in the second quarter of 2005 as the
average borrowing levels were lower. Interest expense was partially offset by interest income
received on short term investments, overnight investments of excess cash, and the receipt of
interest on a past due receivable. Pro forma net interest for the six months ended June 30, 2005
was $0.1 million compared to $0.3 million for the same period a year ago.
Provision for Income Taxes. A tax benefit of $2.1 million was recorded for the second quarter
of 2005 compared to a tax expense of $1.3 million for the same period last year. A $1.0 million
tax benefit was recorded for the first six months of 2005 compared to tax expense of $2.8 million
for the first six months of 2004. Certain merger expenses are not deductible for tax purposes and
the tax benefit has been adjusted to reflect those expenses. We expect our effective tax rate to
be approximately 38% in the second half of 2005.
On a pro forma basis the effective tax rate used in the year to date pro forma calculation of
income taxes was 38% for 2005 and 39% for 2004. The pro forma income tax benefit was $2.1 million
for the second quarter of 2005 compared to income tax expense of $2.0 million for the second
quarter of 2004. For the six month period ended June 30, 2005 the pro forma income tax benefit was
$1.7 million compared to income tax expense of $3.9 million for the six month period ended June 30,
2004.
Net Income and Earnings Per Share. We reported a net loss of $3.5 million, or $0.10 per
diluted share, in the second quarter of 2005, compared to net income of $1.9 million, or $0.09 per
diluted share, for the same period last year. The decline in net income is due to a decline in the
gross margin rates primarily in the Specialty Services segment. It is also attributed to the
write off of acquired trade names, merger and integration expenses and increased amortization
expense due to the Chronimed acquisition. The number of average diluted shares in the second
quarter of 2005 was 36,829 compared to 22,780 for the second quarter of 2004, due to the
acquisition and the related issuance of stock. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 we recorded
a net loss of $1.9 million, or $0.06 per diluted share. This compares to net income of $4.1
million, or $0.18 per diluted share, for the same period last year. We expect to incur additional
merger and integration expenses for the balance of 2005, and into the first quarter of 2006. We
expect that the amortization associated with the Chronimed acquisition will remain at $1.3 million
for the remainder of the year.
Pro forma net loss for the second quarter of 2005 was $3.5 million, or $0.10 per share,
compared to pro forma net income of $3.2 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, for the second
quarter of 2004. The variance is the result of the decline in revenue and related gross margin
dollars, as well as a decline in the gross margin rates in the Specialty Services segment. It is
also attributable to the trade name write off and increased merger and integration expenses. For
the six months ended June 30, 2005 pro forma net loss is $2.7 million, or $0.09 per diluted share,
compared to pro forma net income of $6.1 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, for the same period
last year.
21
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We utilize both funds generated from operations and available credit under the Facility (as
defined below) for acquisitions, capital expenditures and general working capital needs.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005 net cash used in operating activities totaled $8.3
million compared to $2.8 million for the same period last year as a result of greater cash flow.
Accrued expenses of $16.1 million were paid in the first six months of 2005 including the earnout
for the Natural Living acquisition, the Value Options settlement, merger costs and wholesaler
inventory payments. Accounts receivable balances increased as a result of increased revenues at
the dispensing pharmacies. Cash payments were partially offset by an increase in accounts payable
caused by increased inventory and timing of payments. The operating cash used in the first six
months of 2004 was primarily rebate share payments to plan sponsors, offset by a decrease in
inventory.
Net cash provided by investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $17.1
million, primarily due to the acquisition of Chronimed which provided cash, net of acquisition
costs, of $17.0 million. This compares to $14.6 million used in the same period in 2004, primarily
for the acquisition of Natural Living.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005 net cash used in financing activities was $6.3 million
compared to net cash provided by financing activities of
$10.5 million for the same period in 2004, a $17.8 million
decrease from the same period in 2004.
There were no outstanding bank borrowings at June 30, 2005 under our $45 million revolving
credit facility (the Facility) with an affiliate of
Healthcare Finance Group, Inc. (HFG).
At June 30, 2005 we had working capital of $75.5 million compared to working capital of $14.4
million at December 31, 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to the addition of cash,
accounts receivable and inventory acquired from Chronimed, and the reduction in the line of credit
balance.
The Facility has a three-year term secured by our receivables with interest paid monthly. It
provides for borrowings of up to $45 million at the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus
2.4%. The Facility contains various covenants that, among other things, require us to maintain
certain financial ratios, as defined in the agreements governing the Facility. After the initial
three-year term, the Facility automatically renews for additional one-year terms unless either
party gives notice not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the initial term or any renewal
term of its intention not to renew the Facility. The Facility permits us to request an increase in
the amount available for borrowing to up to $100 million, subject to credit approval, as well as
converting a portion of any outstanding borrowings from a Revolving Loan into a Term Loan. The
borrowing base utilizes receivables balances, among other things, as collateral.
Our daily borrowings during the first six months of 2005 were $364.3 million and $371.6
million was repaid during the same period. At no point during the first six months did the line
of credit balance exceed $19.0 million.
On February 2, 2004, we acquired Natural Living for $15 million in cash. Direct expenses
associated with the acquisition were approximately $0.5 million.
The acquisition was paid for with
proceeds from the Facility.
As revenue continues to grow, we anticipate that our working capital needs will increase. We
believe that our cash on hand, together with funds available under the Facility and cash expected
to be generated from operating activities will be sufficient to fund our anticipated working
capital and other cash needs for at least the next twelve months.
We also may pursue joint venture arrangements, business acquisitions and other transactions
designed to expand our Specialty Services and PBM Services businesses, which we would expect to
fund from cash on hand, borrowings under the Facility, other future indebtedness or, if
appropriate, the private and/or public sale or exchange of our debt or equity securities.
At December 31, 2004 we had Federal net operating loss carry forwards (NOLs) of
approximately $16.7 million, which will begin expiring in 2009. These remaining federal NOLs will
not affect our effective tax rate when utilized. Such NOLs are included in deferred tax assets on
our balance sheet. We will receive a cash flow benefit from the reduction in our income tax
liability when the remaining federal NOLs are utilized. Certain of the NOLs are subject to
limitation and may be utilized in a future year upon release of the limitation. If the NOLs are
not utilized in the year they are available they may be utilized in a future year to the extent
they have not expired.
22
Other Matters
On August 16, 2004, a lawsuit encaptioned Unger v. Chronimed Inc., et al. was filed in
the District Court in Hennepin County, Minnesota against Chronimed and each of its then current
directors. On December 10, 2004, an amended complaint was filed to add an additional plaintiff and
the Company as a defendant. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that in structuring the terms
of the proposed merger, each of the members of Chronimeds Board of Directors breached their
respective fiduciary duties to Chronimeds shareholders and personally benefited Henry F.
Blissenbach, who was then serving as Chronimeds, and currently serves as the Companys, Chief
Executive Officer, as well as other members of Chronimeds management. Chronimed and the
individual defendants deny the allegations, believe the action is without merit and intend to
vigorously defend against these allegations. To that end, we filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs
claims. On May 10, 2004 the Minnesota District court dismissed plaintiffs claims without
prejudice. On July 1, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion to amend the dismissed complaint and a motion
to vacate the courts dismissal of the action with leave to amend the dismissed complaint. A
hearing on those motions has been scheduled for October 11, 2005.
On February 14, 2005, a complaint was filed in the Alabama Circuit Court for Barbour County,
captioned Eufaula Drugs, Inc. v. ScriptSolutions [sic]. The complaint pleads
breach of contract and related legal claims on behalf of a putative nationwide class of pharmacies
alleging insufficient reimbursement for prescriptions dispensed, principally on the theory that
ScripSolutions, one of the Companys subsidiaries, was obligated to update its prescription pricing
files on a daily, rather than weekly, basis. ScripSolutions removed the case to the United States
Federal District Court for the Middle District of Alabama in April 2005. The plaintiff moved to
remand the action to state court, which ScripSolutions opposed; the motion is awaiting decision.
ScripSolutions also moved in May to dismiss the complaint on jurisdictional grounds or to transfer
the matter to a federal court in New York or Rhode Island. Plaintiff recently filed its
opposition and ScripSolutions will file a reply, at which point the motion will await decision.
ScripSolutions has not filed an answer to the complaint and no other proceedings have occurred.
ScripSolutions intends to deny the plaintiffs allegations and defend the claims vigorously. The
action is one of approximately 14 substantially identical actions commenced in Alabama courts
against Pharmacy Benefit Management companies.
The Company has been informed by the office of the United States Attorney in Boston,
Massachusetts, that its Chronimed Holdings, Inc. dba StatScript
Pharmacy subsidiary (StatScript),
along with other parties, are defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for
the District of Massachusetts under the so-called qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act
(the Act). A qui tam action is a civil lawsuit brought by one or more individuals (a qui tam
relator) for an alleged submission to the federal government of a false claim for payment. The
complaint has been filed under seal and has not been served on or provided to the Company or
StatScript. The United States has a right to intervene in the action but has not yet determined
whether to do so. The U.S. Attorneys office has advised the Company that the allegations relate
to distribution of a pharmaceutical product and that StatScript submitted Medicaid reimbursement
claims during the years 1997 through 2000 aggregating $17.5 million. The Company does not know
what relief is sought in the complaint. The Act provides for recovery of up to three times the
amount of false claims, penalties, and interest. At this time, BioScrip cannot determine what
defenses it may have to the allegations of the complaint or estimate the amount of damages in the
event of an adverse ruling.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest relate primarily to our debt. At June 30,
2005 we did not have any long-term debt. We do not invest in, or otherwise use, derivative
financial instruments.
At June 30, 2005, the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, claims payable, payables to plan sponsors and others, and debt approximate fair
value due to their short-term nature.
Because management does not believe that our exposure to interest rate market risk is material
at this time, we have not developed or implemented a strategy to manage this market risk through
the use of derivative financial instruments or otherwise. We will assess the significance of
interest rate market risk from time to time and will develop and implement strategies to manage
that market risk as appropriate.
23
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to assist management in
recording, processing, summarizing and reporting on a timely basis information required to be
disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
As of the end of the period covered by this Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13d-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of
the period covered by this Report our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate to enable us
to record, process, summarize and report information required to be in our periodic SEC filings
within the required time.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As previously disclosed in our Form 10-K, management concluded that its internal control over
financial reporting was not effective as of the end of the period covered by the Form 10-K, because
of the following identified material weaknesses: the insufficient staffing of the accounting and
financial reporting function principally due to the resignation in June 2004 of our Chief
Accounting Officer, the resignation of our Chief Financial Officer on January 7, 2005, and the
September 2004 resignation of our audit committee financial expert.
Management believes that all of the material weaknesses identified above have been remedied as
of June 30, 2005. In the quarter ended March 31, 2005, two of the material weaknesses described
above were remedied. We added a financial expert to our audit committee and named Gregory H. Keane
our Chief Financial Officer. During the quarter ended June 30, 2005 we added a Controller who
replaced the functions performed by our previous Chief Accounting Officer. Management believes
that these actions fully remedy the previously identified material weaknesses. We invite the reader
to refer to the full text of the Item 9A discussion in the Form 10-K.
24
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On August 16, 2004, a lawsuit encaptioned Unger v. Chronimed Inc., et al. was filed in
the District Court in Hennepin County, Minnesota against Chronimed and each of its then current
directors. On December 10, 2004, an amended complaint was filed to add an additional plaintiff and
the Company as a defendant. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that in structuring the terms
of the proposed merger, each of the members of Chronimeds Board of Directors breached their
respective fiduciary duties to Chronimeds shareholders and personally benefited Henry F.
Blissenbach, who was then serving as Chronimeds, and currently serves as the Companys, Chief
Executive Officer, as well as other members of Chronimeds management. Chronimed and the
individual defendants deny the allegations, believe the action is without merit and intend to
vigorously defend against these allegations. To that end, we filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs
claims. On May 10, 2004 the Minnesota District court dismissed plaintiffs claims without
prejudice. On July 1, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion to amend the dismissed complaint and a motion
to vacate the courts dismissal of the action with leave to amend the dismissed complaint. A
hearing on those motions has been scheduled for October 11, 2005.
On February 14, 2005, a complaint was filed in the Alabama Circuit Court for Barbour County,
captioned Eufaula Drugs, Inc. v. ScriptSolutions [sic]. The complaint pleads
breach of contract and related legal claims on behalf of a putative nationwide class of pharmacies
alleging insufficient reimbursement for prescriptions dispensed, principally on the theory that
ScripSolutions, one of the Companys subsidiaries, was obligated to update its prescription pricing
files on a daily, rather than weekly, basis. ScripSolutions removed the case to the United States
Federal District Court for the Middle District of Alabama in April 2005. The plaintiff moved to
remand the action to state court, which ScripSolutions opposed; the motion is awaiting decision.
ScripSolutions also moved in May to dismiss the complaint on jurisdictional grounds or to transfer
the matter to a federal court in New York or Rhode Island. Plaintiff recently filed its
opposition and ScripSolutions will file a reply, at which point the motion will await decision.
ScripSolutions has not filed an answer to the complaint and no other proceedings have occurred.
ScripSolutions intends to deny the plaintiffs allegations and defend the claims vigorously. The
action is one of approximately 14 substantially identical actions commenced in Alabama courts
against Pharmacy Benefit Management companies.
The Company has been informed by the office of the United States Attorney in Boston,
Massachusetts, that its Chronimed Holdings, Inc. dba StatScript
Pharmacy subsidiary (StatScript),
along with other parties, are defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for
the District of Massachusetts under the so-called qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act
(the Act). A qui tam action is a civil lawsuit brought by one or more individuals (a qui tam
relator) for an alleged submission to the federal government of a false claim for payment. The
complaint has been filed under seal and has not been served on or provided to the Company or
StatScript. The United States has a right to intervene in the action but has not yet determined
whether to do so. The U.S. Attorneys office has advised the Company that the allegations relate
to distribution of a pharmaceutical product and that StatScript submitted Medicaid reimbursement
claims during the years 1997 through 2000 aggregating $17.5 million. The Company does not know
what relief is sought in the complaint. The Act provides for recovery of up to three times the
amount of false claims, penalties, and interest. At this time, BioScrip cannot determine what
defenses it may have to the allegations of the complaint or estimate the amount of damages in the
event of an adverse ruling.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) |
|
On May 25, 2005, the Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting). |
|
(b) |
|
At the Annual Meeting, the Companys stockholders elected Henry F. Blissenbach, Richard A.
Cirillo, Charlotte W. Collins, Louis T. DiFazio, Richard H. Friedman, Myron Z. Holubiak, David
R. Hubers, Michael Kooper, Richard L. Robbins and Stuart A. Samuels as directors to serve
until the Companys next annual meeting. |
|
(c) |
|
At the Annual Meeting, Stockholders also ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the
Companys independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005. |
25
Set forth below are the final results of the votes cast for those matters submitted to
stockholders:
(i) |
|
Election of Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Henry F. Blissenbach |
|
|
33,696,572 |
|
|
|
293,000 |
|
Richard A. Cirillo |
|
|
25,032,318 |
|
|
|
8,957,254 |
|
Charlotte W. Collins |
|
|
33,815,378 |
|
|
|
174,194 |
|
Louis T. DiFazio |
|
|
33,815,335 |
|
|
|
174,237 |
|
Richard H. Friedman |
|
|
33,318,425 |
|
|
|
671,147 |
|
Myron Z. Holubiak |
|
|
33,818,298 |
|
|
|
171,274 |
|
David R. Hubers |
|
|
33,784,898 |
|
|
|
204,674 |
|
Michael Kooper |
|
|
33,812,116 |
|
|
|
177,456 |
|
Richard L. Robbins |
|
|
33,736,876 |
|
|
|
252,696 |
|
Stuart A. Samuels |
|
|
33,812,928 |
|
|
|
176,644 |
|
(ii) |
|
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys
independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Against |
|
|
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
33,650,119 |
|
|
253,289 |
|
|
|
86,164 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of BioScrip, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (File No. 333-119098), as amended, which became effective on January 26, 2005) |
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of BioScrip, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on
May 15, 2003) |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1
|
|
Employment Offer Letter dated
July 18, 2005 from the Company to Gregory H. Keane |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.2
|
|
Employment Offer Letter dated
July 18, 2005 from the Company to Anthony J. Zappa |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.3
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated
July 18, 2005, to Change of Control Severance Agreement of
Anthony J. Zappa |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
Certification of Henry F. Blissenbach pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
Certification of Gregory H. Keane pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
Certification of Henry F. Blissenbach pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2
|
|
Certification of Gregory H. Keane pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIOSCRIP, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2005
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gregory H. Keane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory H. Keane, Chief Financial Officer |
27
EX-10.1
Exhibit 10.1
July 18, 2005
Greg Keane
BioScrip
Dear Greg,
I am pleased that the BioScrip board of directors has approved the executive compensation
arrangements. I want you to be part of the future success of the company and, accordingly, am
pleased to formally extend to you this offer of continued employment with BioScrip. This offer of
employment is in accordance with the June 14, 2004 Change of Control Severance Agreement between
you and Chronimed, Inc (the Agreement).
I believe this offer package is fair and competitive and provides substantial opportunity for you
to share in the success of the integration process and the future growth of BioScrip. It is
intended that the arrangements discussed here are privileged communications between you, the
Compensation Committee, and myself and may not be disclosed or communicated without their consent.
Job Title and Authority
Your position would be Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In that capacity,
you would be responsible for carrying out your responsibilities as per the attached job
description.
Salary, Benefits and Annual Incentives
Your total cash compensation opportunity is $460,625. It is derived as follows:
Your base
salary would be $275,000 per year, payable on a bi-weekly basis
effective April 1, 2005. I have attached a
summary of all employee benefit plans, programs and policies currently in effect and for which you
are eligible to participate, with the exception of vacation. You would continue to be eligible to
participate in those plans. You would receive four weeks of vacation time. These benefits will
remain substantially similar until at least January 1, 2006 at which time we expect to merge former
MIM and Chronimed employees into a single benefits program that would continue to be a valuable and
competitive complement to the financial package described herein.
You are also eligible to participate in BioScrips annual management bonus plan as long as you
remain continuously employed with BioScrip through the last date of the fiscal year on which a
bonus is based. Your BioScrip target bonus opportunity would be 45% of your base salary, or
$123,750; with an upside opportunity of up to another 22.5% or $61,875. Keep in mind that your
2005 bonus opportunity will be pro-rated to reflect three quarters. The Plan is based on the
achievement of corporate financial objectives as well as individual objectives; I will be
distributing to you shortly the specifics of the bonus criteria and thresholds determining bonus
entitlement.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
To facilitate your sharing in the long-term success of BioScrip and to align your interests with
those of BioScrips shareholders, BioScrips Compensation Committee has granted you 155,250 options
to purchase BioScrips common stock, at an exercise price of $6.00 per share. As we discussed,
this number represents 150% of the base grant, is subject to forfeiture in the event that certain
financial performance thresholds are not met, and shall be subject to the terms and conditions of a
stock option agreement that you will receive shortly. For so long as you are
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10900 Red Circle Drive
|
|
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
|
|
952-979-3600
|
|
www.bioscrip.com |
employed with BioScrip, you will be eligible to participate in BioScrips Long Term Incentive Plan.
In future years, targets will be set at the beginning of each year and a performance-based grant
will be made at the end of the year consistent with directives of the Compensation Committee.
The Company reserves the right to modify, amend or terminate the terms and provisions, thresholds
and/or benchmarks of any health or other company benefits, the bonus program, the long term
incentive compensation program or any other benefit or program generally available to you from time
to time and at any time; provided, that any such modification, amendment or termination will not
affect your entitlement to amounts or benefits to be received thereunder and no such modifications,
amendments or termination will adversely affect you for periods prior to the effective date
thereof.
Non Competition & Nondisclosure Agreement
As a condition of continued employment, you will be required to review, complete, and sign the
Restrictive Covenants attached to this offer letter. The job offer and benefits described herein,
shall supersede all prior or current verbal or written arrangements you have with Chronimed Inc.
Please note that this letter does not constitute a guarantee of continued employment for any term.
Under this offer, you will remain an at will employee, as you are currently, but of course,
subject to the Agreement. Under the Agreement, if you accept this offer, then, during the one year
period commencing on the date you begin performing services in accordance with this offer, if (i)
BioScrip terminates your employment without cause, (ii) you terminate your employment for Good
Reason, (iii) the Company delivers a notice of termination of the June 14, 2004 Change of Control
Severance Agreement or (iv) fails to assign said agreement to a successor employer, then you shall
be entitled to receive the severance benefit described in Section 4 of the Agreement.
Greg, I believe that BioScrip is in an excellent position to sustain and enhance its success and
growth. I would like you to be a part of that effort. Please confirm your decision as soon as
possible, but within 30 days, acknowledging your acceptance by signing, dating, and returning the
original of this letter and the enclosed forms to me. A copy is enclosed for your records.
This letter agreement supersedes in all respects the prior letter agreement between you and your
Company dated June 2, 2005.
Sincerely,
/s/ Henry Blissenbach
Henry Blissenbach
Chief Executive Officer
Agreed and accepted:
|
|
|
/s/
Gregory H. Keane |
|
|
|
|
|
8/8/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Please return this letter to:
Colleen Haberman
Vice President, Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10900 Red Circle Drive
|
|
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
|
|
952-979-3600
|
|
www.bioscrip.com |
EX-10.2
Exhibit 10.2
July 18, 2005
Tony Zappa
BioScrip
Dear Tony,
I am pleased that the BioScrip board of directors has approved the executive compensation
arrangements. I want you to be part of the future success of the company and, accordingly, am
pleased to formally extend to you this offer of continued employment with BioScrip.
I believe this offer package is fair and competitive and provides substantial opportunity for you
to share in the success of the integration process and the future growth of BioScrip. It is
intended that the arrangements discussed here are privileged communications between you, the
Compensation Committee, and myself and may not be disclosed or communicated without their consent.
Job Title and Authority
Your position would be Executive Vice President, Community Pharmacy Operations. In that
capacity, you would be responsible for carrying out your responsibilities as per the attached job
description.
Salary, Benefits and Annual Incentives
Your total cash compensation opportunity is $424,000. It is derived as follows:
Your base salary would be $265,000 per year, payable on a bi-weekly basis. I have attached a
summary of all employee benefit plans, programs and policies currently in effect and for which you
are eligible to participate, with the exception of vacation. You would continue to be eligible to
participate in those plans. You would receive four weeks of vacation time. These benefits will
remain substantially similar until at least January 1, 2006 at which time we expect to merge former
MIM and Chronimed employees into a single benefits program that would continue to be a valuable and
competitive complement to the financial package described herein.
You are also eligible to participate in BioScrips annual management bonus plan as long as you
remain continuously employed with BioScrip through the last date of the fiscal year on which a
bonus is based. Your BioScrip target bonus opportunity would be 40% of your base salary, or
$106,000; with an upside opportunity of up to another 20% or $53,000. Keep in mind that your 2005
bonus opportunity will be pro-rated to reflect three quarters. The Plan is based on the
achievement of corporate financial objectives as well as individual objectives; I will be
distributing to you shortly the specifics of the bonus criteria and thresholds determining bonus
entitlement.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
To facilitate your sharing in the long-term success of BioScrip and to align your interests with
those of BioScrips shareholders, BioScrips Compensation Committee has granted you 103,500 options
to purchase BioScrips common stock, at an exercise price of $6.00 per share. As we discussed,
this number represents 150% of the base grant, is subject to forfeiture in the event that certain
financial performance thresholds are not met, and shall be subject to the terms and conditions of a
stock option agreement that you will receive shortly. For so long as you are employed with
BioScrip, you will be eligible to participate in BioScrips Long Term Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10900 Red Circle Drive
|
|
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
|
|
952-979-3600
|
|
www.bioscrip.com |
In future years, targets will be set at the beginning of each year and a performance-based grant
will be made at the end of the year consistent with directives of the Compensation Committee.
The Company reserves the right to modify, amend or terminate the terms and provisions, thresholds
and/or benchmarks of any health or other company benefits, the bonus program, the long term
incentive compensation program or any other benefit or program generally available to you from time
to time and at any time; provided, that any such modification, amendment or termination will not
affect your entitlement to amounts or benefits to be received thereunder and no such modifications,
amendments or termination will adversely affect you for periods prior to the effective date
thereof.
Non Competition & Nondisclosure Agreement
As a condition of continued employment, you will be required to review, complete, and sign the
Restrictive Covenants attached to this offer letter. The job offer and benefits described herein,
shall supersede all prior or current verbal or written arrangements you have with Chronimed Inc.
Please note that this letter does not constitute a guarantee of continued employment for any term.
Under this offer, you will remain an at will employee, as you are currently, but of course,
subject to the Agreement. Under the Agreement, if you accept this offer, then, during the one year
period commencing on the date you begin performing services in accordance with this offer, if (i)
BioScrip terminates your employment without cause, (ii) you terminate your employment for Good
Reason, (iii) the Company delivers a notice of termination of the January 3, 2005 Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement by and among Chronimed, Inc. and you or (iv) fails to assign said
agreement to a successor employer, then you shall be entitled to receive the severance benefit
described in Section 4 of the Agreement.
Tony, I believe that BioScrip is in an excellent position to sustain and enhance its success and
growth. I would like you to be a part of that effort. Please confirm your decision as soon as
possible, but within 30 days, acknowledging your acceptance by signing, dating, and returning the
original of this letter and the enclosed forms to me. A copy is enclosed for your records.
Sincerely,
/s/ Henry Blissenbach
Henry Blissenbach
Chief Executive Officer
Agreed and accepted:
Please return this letter to:
Colleen Haberman
Vice President, Human Resources
10900 Red Circle Drive
Minnetonka, MN 55343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10900 Red Circle Drive
|
|
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
|
|
952-979-3600
|
|
www.bioscrip.com |
EX-10.3
Exhibit 10.3
July 18, 2005
Mr. Anthony Zappa
Re: Amendment No. 2 to Change of Control Severance Agreement
Dear Tony:
Reference is made to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, undated, between
BioScrip, Inc. and you (as amended from time to time, the Agreement). This letter shall serve to
amend the Agreement as follows:
1. |
|
Section 3.E.(iii) of the Agreement is hereby amended to add to the definition of Good
Reason the following new subsection e., which shall read as follows: |
|
e. |
|
[Employee no longer reporting directly to the Companys Chief Executive Officer
as of the date hereof as the result of a change of reporting structure.] |
2. |
|
Except as set forth herein, the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain unmodified
and in full force and effect. |
Kindly signify your agreement to the foregoing by signing below and forward an executed copy to me
for our files.
Sincerely,
BioScrip, Inc.
Agreed
and Accepted this 9th day of July, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10900 Red Circle Drive
|
|
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
|
|
952-979-3600
|
|
www.bioscrip.com |
EX-31.1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Henry F. Blissenbach, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BioScrip, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
Date: August 9, 2005
Henry F. Blissenbach, Chief Executive Officer
EX-31.2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Gregory H. Keane, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BioScrip, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
Date: August 9, 2005
Gregory H. Keane, Chief Financial Officer
EX-32.1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioScrip, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Henry F. Blissenbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: August 9, 2005
Henry F. Blissenbach, Chief Executive Officer
EX-32.2
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioScrip, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Gregory H. Keane, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: August 9, 2005
Gregory H. Keane, Chief Financial Officer